Wednesday, September 17, 2025

New reflections on Frank Zappa

 

FRANK ZAPPA

 

I’ve been watching a documentary, Zappa, about Frank Zappa that I found on YouTube, covering his life and career from beginning to end, and though the basic outlines of his story is familiar to me, there is still a bunch of stuff in this documentary I didn’t know about and it’s fascinating to hear his interviews and the views from his musical collaborators, wife and other people who knew him. Zappa comes across, as so many artists do, as a contradictory person who could be both aloof and cold yet also warm, friendly and supportive; single minded in his pursuit of what he saw as excellence; technically proficient as musician and composer yet with a low brow sense of humour in his parodies; a loyal husband but not averse, by his own account, to taking advantage of the benefits “road ladies” offered him; and so on.

 

Zappa might have started out as a rocker, sort of, influenced by rhythm ‘n blues records, the unorthodox compositions of Edgar Varese and jazz, but soon became and ambitious composer himself and was probably more focused on orchestral music by the end of his life (in 1993) than he was on his brand of iconoclastic jazz rock. There was a concert of orchestral music, released posthumously on record as The Yellow Shark, which seemed to be some kind of culmination and acceptance, at last and too late, of Zappa’s ambition to ascend to the ranks of highly rated modern composers.  There are several scenes in the documentary where he refers to the expense of getting a proper philharmonic orchestra to perform his music, which made such an endeavour unfeasible, at least for a guy like him who would’ve wanted to do it himself to retain full control.  Up to the last concert, Zappa could draw large audiences for his rock concerts but who knows how many people outside of the rock fans would’ve wanted to attend an orchestral evening so that it would be financially worthwhile, even if that means simply breaking even?

 

My relationship with his music is ambivalent. I’m not a huge fan but I do like some of his stuff and I’ve acquired or at least listened to, a fair amount of his output. He was a hero to various members of my peer group at University, when I was still more interested in blues and loud, fast rock, presumably because Zappa’s compositions weren’t pop, not quite prog, but fused jazz, rock, symphonic ideas with his unique musical vision that was tailor made for young people with an intellectual interest in music.

 

Tracks like “Peaches en Regalia” and “Son of Mr Gren Genes” off Hot Rats (1969) and “Cosmik Debris” and “Stink-foot” off Apostrophe (1974) received airplay on South African rock radio, and Chris Prior was particularly fond of  and he also favoured.  Of course, Zappa wasn’t a commercial rock act and only the DJs who were into and promoted. prog rock sounds, deigned to play his music and this probably gave him plenty of underground cachet amongst those who sneered at top 40 radio hits.

 

I bought a Warner Brothers “twofer” double set of Hot Rats (1969) and Chunga’s Revenge (1970), both credited as solo Zappa records, because it was cheap and seemed to be a low risk entry into the oeuvre.  I’d heard “Peaches en Regalia” and “Son of Mr Gren Genes” on the radio, read about Hot Rats in NME where it was described as a work of jazz rock genius and my mates at University seemed to rate it.

 

Frankly, during the early ‘80s, when I bought the double set, I listened to the records a few times and then set them aside. It took a few decades before I truly appreciated the music but even then it was never love, only appreciation. Hot Rats was kind of the jazz from hell (to quote Zappa out of context) album and Chunga’s Revenge seemed almost orthodox rock by comparison.

 

My prevailing memory of Zappa's music is the ubiquitous presence of the vibraphone (I always just thought of it as an adult xylophone) and the weird time signatures and tempo changes that may have been indicators of a very sophisticated technical ambition and proficiency but didn’t impress or appeal to me very much. The best parts on these two records, apart from some Captain Beefheart vocals, were the Zappa guitar solos. He had a forceful, supple and melodic style that was recognisably Zappa and satisfyingly tough.

 

A mate lent me Bongo Fury (1975) (which I taped) and the tracks I got into immediately were the Beefheart songs and album closer, “Muffin Man” but over time, and possibly because I played the tape far more often than I did Hot Rats, the record grew on me and it’s still a favourite. Zappa’s humorous lyrics aren’t just pointedly political but he plays a lot of searing guitar solos, especially an extended rave up on “Advance Romance.”

 

The Beefheart songs like “Bongo Fury” and “Sam With Showing Scalp Flattop” were weird and compelling and  Zappa’s  “Poofter’s Froth, Wyoming Plans Ahead” and “Muffin Man” were funny and compelling. My main impression of Zappa as a lyricist is that he does want humour to belong in music and is not afraid to be mordantly funny as a reflection of his own peculiar world vision.

 

I was always under the impression, amongst the bohemian coterie of my extended friend group, that I was alone in my lack of enthusiasm for Frank Zappa’s music. I was the philistine who failed to have intellectual appreciation for high art tock music, prog rock by any other name.

 

In the early ‘90s a member of my extended friend group and a chemical engineer with bohemian flair, was so heavily committed to his own personal Frank Zappa obsession that he went to a great deal of trouble in the pre-Amazon.com world to source and import the video cassette tape of the Zappa concert movie Baby Snakes probably directly from Zappa's business enterprise.

 

The story of the efforts to find and purchase this apparently elusive video, which wasn’t available in South Africa at all, was an epic saga for many a braai and beer evening.

 

When the guy finally got his sweaty hands on the video tape, he invited a bunch of us around to the house he was then renting on Red Hill, in the Simon's Town area, for a gala premiere viewing of the movie. I don’t know what he paid for the video but it wasn’t cheap, not to mention shipping costs, and the effort alone probably justified such a grand gesture. Having shared the tale of the quest with us for so long, it was only right to let us see what the fuss was about. 

 

A small group of us assembled in the lounge in front of the large screen tube television set. Some smoked joints, some drank liquor, all were jolly.

 

Baby Snakes (1983) is a concert movie (from Hallowe’en 1977) of the late ‘70s Zappa band with Terry Bozzio on drums and Adrian Belew on guitar and a bunch of the usual musical suspects of Zappa’s gang of the era. They were probably the cream of the jazz and off-centre rock world that paid no heed or mind to the punk revolution and in a fashion were at least sartorially and tonsorially close cousins to the Parliafunkadelicment Thang operating at the same time. The movie also has quite astonishing (for a first time viewer like me) stop-motion clay animation footage by Bruce Bickford. 

 

Baby Snakes didn’t entertain me. There was too much of the fleet tempo with intricate chord changes type of music most Zappaphiles apparently adored as an epitome of excellence. The japery between songs wasn’t that funny. You had to have been there and wasted too. This may not have been prog rock but it sure as dammit sounded like Zappa's personal version of it with less of the  pretentious “poetry” of standard prog rock lyrics and more of the sarcasm with which he viewed the world, and the stupid on stage joking. In any event, the movie is just a live show with a band whose members looked odd and acted weird and who concentrated on playing Zappa's intricate music. Perhaps, I would take a different view of proceedings if I were to see the movie today. Back then it did not persuade me to pursue the oeuvre of Francis Zappa.

 

Some years before, perhaps as part of the University of Stellenbosch film club or maybe at the Labia theatre on Orange Street in Cape Town, I had the dubious privilege of watching an old, pretty bad print of 200 Motels (1971), the “surreal documentary” that notably featured Ringo Starr in a strange page boy haircut and tight-fitting polo neck sweater, impersonating Zappa.

 

Apart from a scene of Starr dangling from the ceiling in some kind of elastic rope contraption I have absolutely no recollection of the contents of the movie. I do remember wondering why on earth I’d paid money to see this shit.

 

200 Motels is one of the few movies I did not understand at all and almost walked out of. To me, this movie was a big put on that Zappa was allowed to perpetrate because of the perception of his alleged genius but without any presence of sense or intelligence and that it was a simple case of the hubris that afflicted so many rock stars at the time, believing that they were Renaissance men who could do anything and everything and that their audience would lap it up.  Maybe 200 Motels is an underappreciated work of visionary genius that I’ve somehow misunderstood but I’m okay with that.

 

Chris Prior. “the Rock Professor,” who had a long running late night show on Radio 5 in which he could, at least initially, play what he wanted,  was, and may still be, quite fond of Zappa, and regularly played “Don't Eat The Yellow Snow”, “Cosmik Debris” and “Stink-Foot.”  These tracks made me think of Zappa as a kind of stand-up comedian who also played guitar and composed intricate musical pieces, rather than as a straightforward rock musician. I guess Zappa was never a straightforward rock musician anyway.

 

He had too much of an interest in serious music, famously influenced by Varese and the ambition to write his own “highbrow” music for appreciation outside of the rock audience, to be just a simple rock and roller. 

 

I don’t know why Prior never played the title track from Apostrophe (‘), as it’s a really wild and solid guitar and bass (and drums) master class jam between Zappa and Jack Bruce, as if they’re trying to show where Cream might have gone to if Eric Clapton had been as much a jazzer as Bruce and Ginger Baker.

 

This mid-‘70s period Zappa, though, with Bongo Fury and Zoot Allures (1976), produced the Zappa music I most like. I heard “The Torture Never Stops” from Zoot Allures at Sygma Records when the sales guy played it over the public address system and fell in love with the song. The combination of Zappa's slow, deep, tactile voice and the weird-funny lyrics were captivating. The main reason I didn’t buy the record then, other than financial, was that Frank Zappa's music in general was not to my taste at a time when I was into Bachmann Tuner Overdrive, Cream, Dr Feelgood and Golden Earring.

 

Ship Arriving Too Late To Save A Drowning Witch (1982) contains the surprise hit single “Valley Girl” featuring Zappa's daughter Moon  and was pretty much party rock with social commentary about a newly defined American teen age social type. I bought a cassette tape version of the album in 1983 or 1984, at a record sale somewhere, because I recalled a Time magazine piece about the song when it was a hit.

 

The music in general is pretty much standard Zappa with the added presence of Steve Vai. He became the premier killer speed metal jazz guitar guy of the Eighties (who played the “impossible parts”) and the kind of guitarist whose technical proficiency I can appreciate and whose lack of emotional depth in his playing I deplore. Anyhow, Ship Arriving Too Late … is an enjoyable record with a great deal of emphasis on close harmony and even quasi operatic vocals and the force of a tight band.

 

At some point between 1996 and 2004, when I still had a turntable, I borrowed copies of Over-nite Sensation (1973) and One Size Fits All (1975) from a mate to investigate what critics apparently believed to be a couple of masterpieces and that I hadn’t heard yet. Both these records feature musicians I think of as the ever changing jazz rock troupe de luxe Zappa used after he disbanded the Mothers of Invention that plays the complicated, variable time signature, over-complex music that put me off Zappa for so long. Everything is technically proficient; I didn’t experience much excitement in the product and it was all much of a muchness. 

 

If one looks at the Zappa discography, there is a hell of a lot of Zappaproduct available, apparently 62 albums over 30 years and about as many official posthumous releases. in the Zappa documentary Frank takes a camera crew into a room (a vault?) with archival recordings (tapes stored in neatly marked boxes) of his entire career, both studio and live recordings, including collaborations with other famous musicians. It seems as if the Zappa Family Trust that now controls his artistic heritage could release a album  a year over the next hundred years, if the quality of the work suffices though, given what one learns about Zappa’s view of and approach to his work, Frank himself might not be satisfied with the way in which his unreleased work sees the light of day.

 

In the early ‘90s I saw a series of CD albums at flea market stalls featuring music from live concerts from the ‘70s and ‘80s. at the time I thought they were “legal” bootlegs but they might’ve been authorised releases from the vault. I never bought them, so I never found out how authorised they were.

 

Frank Zappa had a unique, distinctive smooth and soaring guitar style not a million miles removed from the distinctive Carlos Santana sound and it always amazed me that a guy I thought of more as a composer, lyricist, musical director and band leader could play guitar that well. I enjoy his singing voice and prefer him over most of the vocalists he used over the years, except for Beefheart, of course. The humorous, satirical songs, at least the best of them, are still funny and still captivating and deserve immortality.

 

Perhaps, I should invest in Strictly From Commercial, the “best of compilation” released after Zappa's death, to have a collection of the best moments of a long and productive career. On the other hand, perhaps I should simply buy Hot Rats, Apostrophe (') and Zoot Allures. 

 

Sheik Yerbouti and the Joe's Garage albums were commercial success of sorts but I wouldn’t want to own too many Zappa records. The schtick might pale after a while if one is exposed to too much of what the man put out there. Technical proficiency is not the be all and end all of good rock. 

 

It seems to me that Zappa was too intent on being the modern composer and showing off that he was intellectually streets ahead of not only the human race in general but his peer group of musicians in particular. The thing is: rock and roll is often at its best when it's a tad dumb, simple and direct. Zappa never seemed to appreciate the “less is more” approach. Perhaps rock has to have someone like that to contrast with the trite and banal and perhaps it was once important to be able to show that rock wasn't just three chords and mindless boogie but ultimately rock should be visceral and not overtly intellectual and calculated and that is where Zappa leaves me cold. I just don’t like jazz rock all that much and technical virtuosity makes no nevermind to me if the music doesn't speak to my heart. Also, I’m not a fan of marimba/vibraphone/xylophone in rock.

 

Apart from his sometimes bilious invective against flower power and general reactionary repression, and whatever else Zappa considered stupid and petty, and the amazing ensembles he led, and the vast, eclectic body of work he left behind, Frank Zappa is also known for naming his children Moon, Dweezil, Ahmet and Diva.  God knows why he thought he had to avoid non-controversial names. I would never have thought that the name Dweezil (even with the surname Zappa) could be of any benefit to any kind, unless it was the “boy named Sue” principle.

 

Apparently Dweezil is as much a monster guitar player as his father and had a lesser rock career once but is now relatively quiet although he tours with the Zappa Plays Zappa “tribute” show dedicated to his father's music. 

 

Who knows what happened to Moon, Ahmet and Diva? Okay, WikiPedia to the rescue. Moon is an author musician and actress and is married to the drummer for Matchbox 20.  Ahmet Emuukha Rodan Zappa is a musician, actor and novelist.  Diva Thin Muffin Pigeon (I bet the process of finding suitable names for the kids must have been a great source of undiluted fun in the Zappa household) is a musician, actress and artist. I guess one could not expect Frank Zappa's children to live quiet, uneventful suburban lives as wage slaves.

 

The fact that Frank Zappa recorded soundtracks for admittedly low budget movies and rented a studio for his private recording delight, long before he enjoyed any level of commercial success, must illustrate the ambition the young Zappa had and perhaps also that he would always be somewhat different to the rest of his peers, if he had peers. I cannot think of anyone else toiling in the same field as Frank Zappa or following in his footsteps. He is probably a unique phenomenon but due for revisiting, reviving and emulation.

 

Way back before MP3 downloads started killing off record companies, Zappa was unique in controlling his own destiny by marketing his product through his label Barking Pumpkin. If he'd lived to see 2010, Barking Pumpkin would have been (if it isn't already) a website with plenty iTunes style downloadable content from the back catalogues. 

 

As an artist Zappa was as close to a Renaissance man as a rock musician could get. He wrote music and lyrics and performed with a band as band leader, singer and guitarist. He wrote rock, jazz and orchestral instrumental music. He was prolific in his release schedule.  His bands didn’t sound like anybody else I’ve yet heard.

 

I must admit that Frank Zappa is the kind of artist I admire more than like, mostly because his music is generally not visceral enough for my liking. If the jokes don’t work, I don’t care much for the rest of it. By and large Zappa's music has had to grow on me before I could begin to appreciate it and he is therefore the polar opposite of, say, Dr Feelgood, whom I unreservedly loved from the first note of “I Can Tell,”  the opening track off Malpractice, and who I still unreservedly love, at least for their Wilko Johnson led albums. 

 

When I heard the Hot Rats album for the first time I was in my late teens and (at least theoretically) into punk and very much into blues. “Peaches En Regalia” was a nice, smooth, tuneful song but it sounded too much like the kind of schlock that would have slotted nicely into the type and style of music played on the Afrikaans service of the SABC at the time. It probably was never played on the Afrikaans service but that refusal would have been more of a reflection on the narrow-mindedness of the playlist compilers than on the quality of the music or the fact that it would have fitted right in there. Anyhow, this music was not the stuff of adoration as far as I was concerned. It was nice, that was all. Later on the typical Zappa sardonic lyric, underpinned by very serious music, with his truly scrumptious voice, drew me in to liking more Zappa music but never to the extent that I would have paid much money for his records or make an effort to acquire a collection of them.

 

In any event, back in the day when I bought a lot of records, the earlier Zappa albums were simply not available. The earliest widely available record I remember is Zoot Allures. Oh, and for some reason Sygma Records stocked Cruising With Reuben & The Jets (1968) and Weasels Ripped My Flesh (1970) at the time when I started hanging out there, which must have been from about 1972 onwards. I knew about albums like Freak Out! and We're Only in It For The Money but never saw the records. Most of the ‘80s stuff was more or less freely available on release and in the CD age there was a great deal of reissuing of the classic albums.

 

Nowadays (well, 2010), especially in the likes of Musica, you hardly come across any Zappa product. Under Z you will find Z Z Top and Zucchero but not Frank Zappa. I guess this means that he isn’t fashionable, or not yet.

 

Just about every musical style is recycled at one time or another and I am sure that a major artist like Zappa is going to have his followers, even among young musicians, and that it is only a matter of time before a currently unknown group or individual releases a Zappa-esque tune or two which is greeted with great enthusiasm by the rock press and voted album of the year, or whatever, then Frank will find himself in public demand again, there will be the remastered re-releases, the eulogies and all of the rest of the trappings.

 

I've always wanted to own Freak Out!,  Cruising With Reuben & The Jets and even Weasels Ripped My Flesh (strictly speaking these albums are by the Mothers of Invention, but for all practical purposes it is all Frank Zappa).

 

In the case of the last two records the wish to own them is simply based on the nostalgic recollection of all those Friday afternoons I used to hang out at Sygma Records, flipping through the stacks of covers of albums I could not afford to buy even if I wanted to.

 

And that would be about it. At this point my main interest in the music of Frank Zappa is purely historical. Purely and simply I would like to know what it was all about and I cannot see myself suddenly developing an obsessed fascination with the man’s music to the extent where I start seeking out all, or most, of the 60 albums out there.

 

I wonder whether the guy who imported the video cassette of Baby Snakes now owns the DVD version and whether he ever watches it anymore? He was young and impressionable then; now he’s divorced  and works in the snows of Kazakhstan or some such distant oil rich republic that was once part of the Soviet Union. Maybe Baby Snakes is just what you need to pass the long dreary hours when you are not working. After all, it is music, it is funny (kind of) and the claymation effects are pretty amazing.

 

Postscript:

 

Since I’ve joined Apple Music, I’ve been able to investigate a great deal of music not previously available to me, some of it from contemporary, or near contemporary, acts and quite a lot of it from acts I knew of during the ‘70s and early ‘80s.  For at least half of  the ‘70s I didn’t have the money to be able to buy records and one of my pastimes was to hang out in the only record shop in Stellenbosch, studying album covers and preparing a mental bucket/wish list of records I would’ve liked to own.  Records by The Mothers of Invention or Frank Zappa weren’t on any wish list, ever.

 

With Apple Music I’ve been able to listen to many of those records I once desired but, though I’ve done some investigation into Zappa’s back catalogue, I’ve not yet made a concerted, structured effort to listen to all of his output.  I’ve downloaded the records I used to own and recently I’ve listened to Freak Out (1966) (and thought it quite ordinary albeit with japes) but I’m not convinced that I would want to listen to all of the Mothers / Zappa records sequentially.

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, July 25, 2025

In Memoriam George Kooymans

 IN MEMORIAM GEORGE JAN KOOYMANS 

(11 March 1948 – 23 July 2025)

 

In the USA, George Kooymans seems to be primarily remembered as the writer of Golden Earring’s 1982 hit “Twilight Zone” from Cut because it was, incredibly, a bigger hit than “Radar Love,” as if that song were his only contribution to the band. 

 

In truth, Kooymans was the principal songwriter, and guitarist, for Golden Earring, sometimes on nis own, sometimes as collaborator with other band members, and his musical vision, part pop, part rock, part progressive, is what shaped the band over the years. 

 

However, Kooymans is probably a severely and criminally underrated songwriter and I’d guess he doesn’t appear on any “top guitarists of all time” lists either. Perhaps he is more of a hero in his homeland than elsewhere where most people only know “Radar Love” and “Twilight Zone.” 

 

Golden Earring was one of the premier progressive hard rock bands from Europe that, in the mid-‘70s, illustrated that a European sensibility could bring an innovative improvement yet remain basically faithful to a hoary American hard rock trope. The band started as a kind of beat group, morphed into a psychedelic prog type band and settled into a steady career of quirky, creative hard rock and Kooymans was a driving force all the way.

 

“Radar Love” was the major hit around 1973/74 that still finds a place on many classic rock compilations, with a highly memorable opening drum pattern and riff that is a visceral thrill each time I hear it.

 

The parent album, Moontan (1973), was one of those I pored over at my local record store, mostly because of the illustration of a semi-naked woman on the cover but Eight Miles High (1970) also got my attention because the cover image was more mysterious than that of Moontan and one of the tracks was the almost 19-minute long title track, something I wasn’t used to seeing on records when I was a teenager. 

 

Back in the day, one could listen to records at the record store on a try-before-you-buy basis but I was always too shy to ask but, interestingly, there was a Saturday late night rock show on the English Service that played mostly prog rock and. Jazz fusion (possibly because the powers that be who controlled the SABC believed that it was less frivolous than ordinary rock and pop) and that’s where I heard “The Road Swallowed Her Name” and “She Flies On Strange Wings” off Seven Tears (1971).  I guess that Golden Earring was seen as progressive rock rather than as straightforward hard rock.  Until “Radar Love” made it big, “The Road Swallowed Her Name” was the one song from Golden Earing I knew and always remembered because of the mysterious title.

 

Daytime radio and rock stations like LM Radio and later Radio 5 barely played any Golden Earring songs, unless it was “Radar Love.”  Some of the guys at school referred to the odd track, such as “Kill Me (Ce Soir)” from Switch 1975 but by and large Golden Earring seemed to be a best kept secret.

 

Illumination arrived with Earring’s Believing, (around 1975) a single record compilation of the band’s best tunes, which I requested as a birthday or Christmas present because of “Radar Love.”  Neither “The Road Swallowed Her Name” or “Eight Miles High” were on the album but “Kill Me (Ce Soir)” was, plus a bunch of songs I didn’t know at all.

 

It's a good compilation, not available on Apple Music perhaps because it was a compilation created especially for South Africa, or other non-European or non-US. Markets, with a solid selection of tracks covering the period between Eight Miles High and To the Hilt (1975), showcasing both the progressive and hard rock elements, often in the same song, of the music. I loved the selection so much I eventually created an Apple Music playlist with those tracks, adding “The Road Swallowed Her Name.”

 

In around 1976, Hit Parader magazine, a New York based US rock. Monthly, published a piece about Golden Earring and amongst the photographs was an image of Kooymans on stage, in a sharp suit and with shorter hairstyle than nis early ‘70s fashion, reminiscent of Bryan Ferry’s haircut at the time, though a tad longe, and this image mightily impressed me. It was as if he'd updated his image from the post hippy long haired hard rock ‘70s style in the way the band was updating their music, as musicians do who want to remain relevant when times and tastes change.

 

That image is probably how I’ll always visualise Kooymans in my mind’s eye; the sophisticated, fashionable rocker in a suit, in a similar way to how Robbie Robertson dressed for the Last Waltz show.

 

By 1982 Golden Earring, like so many of their rock contemporaries from the ‘70s, had changed style to a more commercial, slickly produced, smooth, AOR arena rock sound that doesn’t appeal to me as much as the ‘70s albums but I guess that’s my bad. Musicians with ambition evolve over time and always try not to repeat themselves, whereas I just want to listen to the old favourites.

 

I can only thank George Kooymans, and his bandmates, for being such a material part of my life and music collection.

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

In Memoriam Ozzy Osbourne

 IN MEMORIAM: OZZY OSBOURNE

 

(3 December 1948 – 22 July 2025)

 

 

X (previously Twitter) overflows today with comments from Sabbath fans, all of whom express a feeling of being gutted at Ozzy Osbourne’s passing and experiencing a dep sense of loss.

 

Ozzy was a legend, both as member of Sabbath and in his  solo career and there are obviously many fans who’d been heavily invested in the music but for me, Ozzy and Sabbath, were just rock acts amongst many others who may not be regarded  as being legendary of as the “fathers of heavy metal” but who make far more interesting music.

 

Perhaps it’s because I wasn’t a Sabbath fan when I was in my teens. I acknowledge Ozzy’s contribution to rock and metal, and his reputation for excess but I can’t say that I’m devastated by his death, mostly because his music barely featured in my life or musical listening experiences.

 

In 1973 copies of Sabbath Bloody Sabbath and Aladdin Sane circulated in the clique of hip kids in my high school. I wasn’t one of them and never had the opportunity to listen to either album though, at least, “Jean Genie” off Aladdin Sane received radio airplay.  Black Sabbath remained mythical for many years. My musical interests, when I too could afford to buy records, didn’t include their brand of hard rock or heavy metal, though, eventually, I heard “Paranoid” somewhere. As luck would have it, the Stellenbosch branch of the Cape Town records store, Ragtime Records, didn’t make it and had a massive closing down sale from which I cherry picked, amongst others, the first three Blue Oyster Cult albums, the first two Stooges albums, the first two MC5\’s and Black Sabbath’s debut album.

 

I liked the slow, doom-laden heaviness of Black Sabbath but it was by far not my favourite album of that haul. I preferred BOC, MC5 and Stooges, as their rock sensibilities matched my own, and I thought that the Sabbath lyrics were simplistic and kind of dumb and Ozzy’s voice and style of singing didn’t do it for me. I wasn’t motivated to investigate further although I did buy Master of Reality when I found it in a bargain bin.  

 

It was only many years later, when I signed up for Apple Music, that I made the effort to listen to the Ozzy era  Sabbath albums in sequence and realised that I’d not missed much. Perhaps Sabbath Bloody Sabbathwould’ve resonated more and louder if I’d heard for the first time when I was 14 and not 54, but when I finally listened to it, it felt like damp squib.

 

Suffice to say, I’ve not been, and am not, a Black Sabbath fan. Currently, I have a Greatest Hits CD compilation (I gave away the records years ago) reflecting the Ozzy years and that’s it. 

 

I’ve listened to some of the solo albums, like Blizzard of Ozz and Diary of a Madman and even these contemporary takes on early ‘80s metal haven’t convinced me to listen to the rest. At bottom, I suppose, it’s mostly because I’ve never been a huge fan of ‘80s metal, even when I was in my twenties and absolutely not now. 

 

For me, Black Sabbath’s career ended with Never Say Die! (1978) and Ozzy’s departure a year later. I didn’t even take note that they’d recruited Ronnie James Dio to carry on their career.  For me, Ozzy’s early solo career was more about biting the heads off bats. the controversy surrounding “Suicide Solution”  and the tragic death of Randy Rhoads than an actual musical career and eventually he became mainstream famous as the almost incoherent, shuffling figure of fun of The Osbournes, the very picture of a retired rocker who barely survived a hard partying lifestyle and was paying the price.

 

Ozzy’s last hurrah was a huge concert in Birmingham om 5 July 2025 where a variety of musicians paid tribute by performing iconic Sabbath and solo Ozzy songs, concluding with the immobile Ozzy in a chair on stage for a mass sing-a-long version of “War Pigs.”  No other era of Black Sabbath will ever attract the same rapt attention and adulation.  

 

So, at a relatively young 76, Ozzy’s race is done and the eulogies and tributes are pouring in in a great outpouring of emotion  and, typically, in death he’ll become even more legendary than in life. His final years were pretty much an irreversible, sad  downward spiral. 

 

Ozzy kind of rusted and then faded away. At least he had a rousing, adoring, sentimental send-off 17 days before passing. 

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Beach Boys Reconsidered

 IN MEMORIAM: BRIAN WILSON (20 June 1942 – 11 June 2025)

BEACH BOYS RECONSIDERED

 

Brian Wilson died last week at the age of 82 (having outlived both his younger brothers) and there was the usual outpouring of adulation, always still referring to the “genius” tag and as the champion of American rock in a quest to equal or better what  The Beatles did, as well as his mental struggles and late career resurgence.

The motivated me to relisten chronologically to all the Beach Boys studio albums up to Holland. 

I am extremely fond of the best of the surf and car songs but it’s very apparent, probably because of a release schedule that sometimes required as many as three LPs a year, albeit usually of brief duration, that those early records contain a significant amount of filler, amongst which the classics really shine.  This is also true of Beatles albums; it seems to me that there is such blind adoration for their output, that the accepted view is that everything on a Beatles record is brilliant because it’s on a Beatles record.

Brian Wilson was a brilliant arranger of vocal harmonies and writer of memorable melodies and on so many tunes those are the only elements of value.

The best way to enjoy the early Beach Boys is on a good compilation album, such as the original 20 Golden Greats (later expanded to 25 Golden Greats) released in the UK and South Africa, or any of the US compilations from the mid-’70s onward.

The huge clamour of claims regarding Brian Wilson’s alleged genius, stem from the period after he’d left the touring group and started making records without them, at least when recording the backing music to which the others simply added their vocals and harmonies, turning into a Phil Spector-like record producer, with vaulting ambition and a penchant for moving away from standard pop song writing to high concept weirdness, even more so that the Beatles could achieve with Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, in which period they dealt with whimsy rather than the off-the-wall weirdness Wilson came up with.

 

I came to Pet Sounds (1966) late, though I knew the best tracks from 20 Golden Greats and some of the others from a strange, budget South African compilation, and I am utterly underwhelmed by it as complete album. It might be one of the best records ever or the best (fully realised) one Brian Wilson ever made and I suppose the conventional, uncritically repeated critical opinion will always rate as it as one the top five best rock albums but it doesn’t particularly resonate with me and I still hold it as a truth that it has its fair share of filler, albeit very well recorded filler.

Perhaps, like Sgt Pepper, one should’ve been young and impressionable when Pet Sounds was first released.

From Smiley Smile (1967) onwards, Brian Wilson’s role and input in the band’s record gradually recede, the pop sounds are left behind and the Beach Boys become a quirky kind of rock group with an emphasis of laid back tunes and hardly any rock, as I understand it, and very few memorable songs, though each album has a few tunes worth compiling into a Beach Boys playlist.

Smiley Smile is the least interesting record because it sounds like a bunch of drugged up guys goofing off in a recording studio rather than musicians focused on and committed to making a worthwhile record.  20/20 and (for me, but against conventional critical opinion) Carl and the Passions – “So Tough”  are the best of the bunch but, for example, “Funky Pretty” on Holland (1973) almost on its own, never mind “Sail On Sailor,” mitigates an album that closes with what was probably supposed to be cutesy, whimsical quirkiness yet sounds like a children’s record that lost its way and is stranded on the adults’ beach.

After Holland the quality drops off sharply and if it’s an iffy proposition to include anything after Pet Sounds(1966) or perhaps Summer Days (and Summer Nights) (1965) in your record collection, there is no merit in any Beach Boy album after 1973. For this period, more than any other, only a compilation of the best tracks will do.

I believe, at their best, Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys were at least as good as the Beatles but the quality reduced much earlier in their career than that of the Beatles, who released good records until they broke up, and had the benefit of a concentrated lifespan where the odds of decline were far less and obviously, terminated while the Beach Boys carried on and on and on, as careerists, long after they no longer offered anything that had average value, not to mention higher than average value.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, March 31, 2025

Dr Feelgood's Live Multiverse

 DR FEELGOOD’S LIVE MULTIVERSE 

 

I’ve recently watched videos of Dr Feelgood’s live performances in four different iterations of the band: the original quartet in 1975, the post-Wilko band with Gypie Mayo on guitar in 1980, the band where only Lee Brilleaux is an original member in 1990 and the totally superfluous current version of Dr Feelgood, with band members who have no historical connection with the brand,  in 2022.

 

I became a committed fan when I heard the then otherworldly sounding “Back In The Night” for the first time on the radio and remained interested after Wilko Johnsons left the band and Gypie Mayo replaced him, as this version of the band had the momentum of the breakthrough years that kept it on an upward, creatively fertile trajectory that peaked with A Case of the Shakes (1980) a bit of a resurgence after the turgid and uninspiring preceding Let It Roll (1979) was a sign of things to come.

 

A Case of the Shakes was, and still is, the last Feelgoods album I bought though I kept up with the news of the band, such as Mayo departing, then Sparko and the Big Figure, Lee Brilleaux’s death and the continuation of the band as a cash grab commercial enterprise with no founding members.

 

The YouTube clips from mostly 1975, from the Geordie Scene television show, some shows in France and a concert at the Kursaal in Southend, feature the band that took the pub rock scene in London by storm with its energy, dangerous looks, the distinctive sharp, choppy guitar sound of Wilko Johnson and his brilliant songs.

 

Dr Feelgood looked and sounded like no-one else and these performances still hold up after all the years. I can see where this iteration of the band could influence the nascent punk rock scene in London.  Dr Feelgood transcended the R & B influences from whence it came, like the Rolling Stones before them, by infusing their original music with the legacy sounds but not simply playing cover versions.

 

By Sneaking Suspicion (1977) the band had run out of steam and personal differences ripped the heart out of it. The remaining trio never really recovered regardless of who joined as guitarist. The band couldn’t replicate their original sound but, worst of all, couldn’t write the kind of quirky, catchy R & B tunes Wilko writes.

 

The 1980 performance in Germany for the Rock Palast show, is by a band that’s been around the block, has seen great success, critically and commercially, for a brief period,  and has now become a professional, proficient “name” band with nothing of the magical spark of their struggle years. 

 

For this particular show, Mayo plays a Stratocaster with a shrill, trebly, tinny sound that’s probably intended to fit in with the New Wave sounds of the time but lacks power and does a disservice to the hard rocking tunes. Brilleaux no longer sings as much as shouts, barks and growls and if he seems as committe4 to the performance as he was 5 years before, he’s toned down the manic aspects of the performance and now comes across as fully professional rather than passionate.

 

The post-Wilko songs aren’t bad, for the most part, especially the ones off A Case of the Shakes but there’s little real excitement about  the performance, even if Gypie Mayo tries his best to throw guitar hero shapes and Brilleaux retains a smidgen of his earlier confrontational self. 

 

By 1990 Dr Feelgood is Lee Brilleaux with backup musicians, though some of the bandmembers stayed with the band for a very long time, and if the sound is tougher, louder and punchier than in 1980, the performances still sound perfunctory and simply professional with zero enthusiasm or passion. The band sounds as if they just want to get the gig done asap, get paid and go home. By this time Brilleaux dresses like a crooner but truly has no voice left and he doesn’t elevate the journeyman-like newer tunes or even the classics. With Wilko and Gypie, Dr Feelgood at least sounded somewhat different to the competition  and had unique elements.  

 

In 1990  Dr Feelgood has become a generic blues rock band relying on well-known brand name for its commercial success but where it might once have been on the cusp of massive success and true greatness, if the original four could’ve kept it together and management was less greedy and shortsighted, Dr Feelgood became an unchallenging, unengaging day job where most concert attendees probably wanted to hear only the Wilko era tunes, of which there is a smattering of dutiful, tedious versions. Dr Feelgood sounds like a cover band of its own tunes.

 

Somehow, 50 years after the first breakthrough, there’s still a band called Dr Feelgood that tours, releases new material and obviously sounds nothing like the Dr Feelgood I came to know and love. There’s clearly no tribute band type intention of replicating the original sound of Dr Feelgood, as if it’s still a creatively innovative band intending to carve out its own path.  That’s all very well, and good luck to them, but if the 1990 iteration sounded generic, this current group sounds generic and mediocre.  The vocalist has limited vocal range and no stage presence and the guitarist, however proficient and experienced he might be, is merely a master of blues rock cliché.  The new tunes are undistinguished and rely on production values and technically proficient musicianship to generate any kind of mild interest.

 

The musicians look to be senior citizens who’d been eking out a living in semi-pro pub bands for most of their lives until this, presumably, plum job came up, to play in a third-tier blues rock band with name recognition with the possibility of making a fairly decent living if you don’t mind the grind of constant touring.

 

Dr Feelgood has returned to being a pub rock band; that’s the level of music they play now. 

 

It’s amazing that Wilko, Lee, Sparko and Big Figure laid the foundations for a. brand name that’s still recognised and can still provide a livelihood for jobbing musicians. There’s absolutely no reason other than commercial exploitation why Dr Feelgood should still exist and I can’t see how the current lot can win new fans. On the other hand, a 25-year-old today will have no sense of the grand  history of the band or of the impact Dr Feelgood made in the mid-Seventies.

 

I still listen to the first four Feelgoods albums with a good deal of pleasure and the opening notes of “I Can Tell” (Malpractice) still thrills as much as ever. Back in the day I bought all the Gypie Mayo era records, up to A Case of the Shakes, of which I’m quite fond, but thereafter I didn’t waste my money. Having listened to all those later period albums on Apple Music, my contemporary opinion of what those albums would sound like, has been confirmed.  Wilko period Dr Feelgood was unique and brilliant. After he left, the band went into a long, slow decline to becoming just another blues rock band among many without any Unique Selling Proposition. I don’t even understand how this version of the band still draws an audience.

 

Of course, it’s an example of still listening to the music that caught my attention as teenager but I’d argue, in this case, that the Dr Feelgood of 50 years ago IS far superior to any subsequent version of it.

 

 

Thursday, March 20, 2025

Lab grown; not the real deal., Hackney Diamonds. The Rolling Stones

 Hackney Diamonds (2023)  

The Rolling Stones

 

A very young Mick Jagger, just starting out on his musical career, once told an interviewer that he couldn’t see himself doing “this” (a pop music career) after the age of 30. In mid-2024, with Jagger and Keith Richards both way past 30 and the only surviving founder members of the band (Ronnie Wood is the only other official Stone but he’s been in the band only for about 48 or 49 years), the Stones are touring behind their latest studio record, Hackney Diamonds, the first such release since the blues standards album Blue & Lonesome in 2016 and the first with original songs since A Bigger Bang (2005.)

 

The band has regularly toured over the past 19 years but the creative impulse to write songs and the motivation and drive to record and release them must be sorely lacking. Younger musicians have a fire and a drive to pursue their career, and often contractual obligations, but by the time they turn, say, 40, the fount of basic raw, inspired creativity is replaced by professional ability and craft.  As Neil Young once explained, he writes songs only when he’s obliged to release a record. This might be a simplification of the process but one can imagine, by the time Young said this, his life was so full of matters other than only his career in music, that he wouldn’t have had the time or luxury to sit around all day writing songs. When he does buckle down to it, he, and many other musicians, may well come up with far more material than the upcoming release may require. The artist records many demos and even does proper recordings of many more tunes than will make it to the track listing of the official release.

 

Bob Dylan has a whole Bootleg series of such previously unreleased songs, and so does Neil Young.

 

With the Rolling Stones there was the odds ‘n sods release Metamorphosis and Tattoo You (1981) was famously cobbled together for old outtakes or half-finished tracks. Their BBC recordings are available now and there have been many bootlegs over the years too, mostly liver recordings but also some studio outtakes. Lately I’ve been seeing advertisements for several box sets of multiple records and CDs relating to albums like Let It Bleed, Sticky Fingers and even (why, I don’t get) Emotional Rescue.  Of course, these records were released 40 years or longer ago and at the time Jagger and Richards may still have been quite prolific songwriters and the band willing to spend more time in the studio.

 

Obviously, the Rolling Stones are no longer bound by a recording contract that compels them to release an album a year, such as still seems to be the case with Neil Young, unless he just wants to record and release as often and as much as possible (and it’s odd that the older some artists get, the more they want to clue us in on  what they did in their younger lives and refused to let us hear then), and so there’s no pressure on Jagger or Richards to write songs or to book studio time.

 

I don’t know whether the Stones have recorded enough material since, say 1989, to be able to release more records than they have or whether there just isn’t that much and the stuff that’s seen official release, is the by far the best of the bunch.  I guess we’ll have to wait and see what happens after the official demise of the Stones.

 

This brings one to the question: why did the Stones feel that they needed or wanted to release a new studio record?  Was it a contractual obligation? Was there a sudden flare up of creativity and the energy to make something of it? Were these songs written over a period of years until the momentum to record them became irresistible? Is it simply one last studio blast before it’s really too late?

 

Now, I’m not the kind of music fan who follows an act for their entire career or buys every release for the sake of completion or because I think everyone is a work of genius because I love the artist.

 

For example: I don’t care for David Bowie’s music after Diamond Dogs, for Aerosmith’s after Night in the Ruts, Dr Feelgood’s after A Case of the Shakes, Blue Oyster Cult’s after Fire of Unknown Origin, Iggy Pop’s after the Stooges and so son.

 

Regarding the Rolling Stones, leaving Blue & Lonesome out of it, my appreciation of their records ends with Some Girls (1978) and I don’t even much like earlier albums like Goats Head Soup (1973) and Black and Blue(1976.)  The canon comprises of the early records, mostly the singles though, and the run from Their Satanic Majesties Request (1967) to Exile on Main Street (1972)plus It’s Only Rock ‘n Roll (1974) and Some Girls.  I bought some of the later records and have listened to all of them and not one has had anything remotely close to the appeal of the earlier stuff.

 

It's down to the songwriting, recording and production of the records. It feels as if Jagger and Richards were more inspired and interesting as lyricists and tunesmiths; the lyrics are engaging.  The loose, funky and rocking, blues-based rock ‘n roll style of playing is more to my taste too and the ‘60s and ‘70s production style suits my ears.  Everything sounds organic and relatively simple with the emphasis on good songs, musical proficiency without being precious about it and non-intrusive production. 

 

I generally dislike the typical, fashionable, over-polished ‘80s production style that so badly dates many records from that era, and especially on the records of ‘60’s and ‘70s acts trying to update their sound to stay current and commercial.

 

This is exactly what happened to the Stones albums after Tattoo You. The production values are high, the records are busy and loud yet the playing sounds like highly proficient studio musicians who just can’t reproduced the loose, funky swing of, say, Exile on Main Street. Granted, the Stones probably no longer wanted to sound like that but what they achieved was just extremely well produced, tedious music that has the Stones trademark licks but not anything of the original visceral excitement. Even worse, Jager and Richards now sound like professional songwriters who craft lyrics like mathematicians instead of inspired poets. Lastly, Jagger’s mannered singing style, which gained traction in the early ‘70s and became steadily more entrenched, just sounds fake and irritating. The artless, relaxed, naturalism of Blue & Lonesome echoes what Jagger used to sound like in his glory days. Now, he and the band, absolutely sound like the showbiz Rolling Stones. They’re no longer simply a band playing massive gigs but a core trio with MOR backing musicians performing vaudeville renditions of their well-worn hits, with the same core set list show after show. Most of those songs are from that purple period hey day I prefer and if that doesn’t convince you of the value of the rest of the catalogue, nothing will.

 

Okay, so 18 years after A Bigger Bang, we’ve been blessed, so to speak, with Hackney Diamonds

 

The following are selected extracts from the Apple Music hype piece about the record: 

“Hackney Diamonds is the band’s most energetic, effortless, and tightest record since 1981’s Tattoo You. Just play “Bite My Head Off”, a rowdy kiss-off where Mick Jagger tells off a bitter lover, complete with a fuzz-bass breakdown by... Paul  McCartney. “At the end of it, I just said, ‘Well, that's just like the old days,’” Richards tells Apple Music of that recording session.

Hackney Diamonds was indeed made like the old days—live, with no click tracks or glossy production tricks—yet still manages to sound fresh. 

 

After years of stalled sessions, and the death of their legendary drummer Charlie Watts in 
2021, Jagger and Richards decided on a fresh start, travelling to Jamaica for a series of writing sessions. Based on a recommendation from McCartney, Jagger hired producer Andrew Watt, who’d also worked with Miley Cyrus, Dua Lipa, Ozzy Osbourne, Post Malone and more, to help them finish the tracks. 

 

“He kicked us up the ass,” Jagger tells Apple Music. 

With Steve Jordan on drums, Watt kept it simple, bringing in vintage microphones and highlighting the interwoven guitars of Richards and Ronnie Wood. “The whole point is the band being very close, eyeball to eyeball, and looking at each other and feeding off of each other,” says Richards. In the spirit of 1978’s genre-spanning Some Girls, the album comprises sweeping riff-heavy anthems (“Angry”, “Driving Me Too Hard”), tortured relationship ballads (“Depending on You”), country-tinged stompers (“Dreamy Skies”) and even dance-floor grooves (“Mess it Up”, featuring a classic Jagger falsetto).

The capstone of the album is “Sweet Sounds of Heaven”, a stirring seven-minute gospel epic featuring Lady Gaga. Halfway through, the song goes quiet, Gaga laughs and Stevie Wonder starts playing the Rhodes keyboard, and then Gaga and Jagger start improvising vocals together; it’s a spontaneous moment that’s perfectly imperfect, reminiscent of the loose Exile on Main St. sessions. “Playing with Stevie is always mind-blowing, and I thought that Lady Gaga did an incredible job, man,” says Richards. “She snaked her way in there and took it over and gave as good as she got with Mick, and it was great fun.”

Richards didn’t expect to make an album this good as he approaches his 80th birthday. But he’s using it as a moment to take stock of his career with the greatest rock ’n’ roll band in the world. “The fact that our music has managed to become part of the fabric of life everywhere, I feel pretty proud about that, more than any one particular thing or one particular song,” he says. “It is nice to be accepted into this legendary piece of bullshit.”

 

 

First off, Charlie Watts’ drumming is sorely missed. Technically gifted as Steve Jordan may be, he doesn’t have the lightness of touch, the nous and the simple groove that Watts brought to the Stones’ music.

 

Secondly, referencing Some Girls as somehow informing the production, sound and tunes of Hackney Diamonds is absolutely misguided. Never mind that contemporary production techniques and values are vastly different; Some Girls sounds fresh and innovative compared to the albums it followed, and preceded, where Hackney Diamonds is of a piece with the Stones’ ‘90s output where loud, hard music is supposed to create an energetic momentum yet leaves one unfulfilled.  You can’t fault the band for effort but they just don’t deliver  memorable music. Just about the only factor that links the music to the classic Stones, sound is Jagger’s voice. The music is just mainstream rock with very little, if any, spark of magic and the musicians don’t sound particularly invested beyond just the professional pride of still being able to do it after all these years.

  

I guess no rock writer in the mainstream, “legacy” media would be so bold as to say anything negative about this record, a kind of monument to, if nothing else, longevity and the power of professionalism of musicians who’ve been plying their trade for such a very long time. The thing is, like Bob Dylan’s recent studio release Rough & Rowdy WaysHackney Diamonds is a testament to professional craft and not to creative inspiration. Jagger and Richards know how to write songs and are pretty proficient at utilising whatever the latest studio technology is but none of it, and this has been the case for more than 40 years, comes across as anything but hard graft and journeymen’s craft.  Hackney Diamonds has high production values and probably sounds awesome when you push the volume button to 11 but the songs aren’t any thing other than perfunctory exercises in tunesmithing; they aren’t inspired or inspiring and I can’t see any of them ever making the list of “Stones classics.” 

 

Lots of people waxed lyrical about this album when it was first released and apparently had it on almost endless repeat. I bet there will be a considerable amount of reconsideration in due course and Hackney Diamonds will be recognised as the novelty it really is and I can foresee that those people who obsess about rating albums will place it firmly in the lower half of the pyramid of Stones albums, a companion to Voodoo Lounge and Bridges to Babylon.