The first Rolling Stones live album I know of is Got Live If You Want
It (1965), a collection of their pop hits from the early Sixties, performed in
front of a typical Stones mania audience where the screams of the teenage girls
drown out the music and in essence the band is just playing like a skiffle band
with no finesse or power. All that the musicians do is to make a rhythmic noise
to accompany Mick's singing. Pretty much a souvenir for those who were there
but otherwise not an essential listening experience. One would ever consider
the Stones to be accomplished musicians after listening to this anodyne album.
The next one is Get Yer Ya Ya's Out (1970), which is record of shows form the notorious (because of
the Altamont disaster) 1969 tour of the United States, the first major Stones
tour since about 1966 and the first tour with Mick Taylor and after they'd left
behind the pop star thing and became the greatest rock and roll band in the
world with Beggar's Banquet (1968) and Let It Bleed (1969) under their collective belts.
At this point the Stones had recorded and released the bulk of the great
Stones songs that people still remember and revere to this day. only two good to
great Stones followed, Sticky Fingers
(1971) and Exile on Main Street (1972).
The pulling power of the Stones increased over the years and their notoriety
increased as well but this was the tour when the future image was created and
set in, um, stone.
Ya Ya's, then, consists of mostly the
most recent songs from the two preceding
albums, plus one rack from Their Satanic Majesties Request (1967) and
some Chuck Berry numbers for really
kicking out the good time jams. Presumably it is a compilation of songs from the live set and
not the whole set. In the mid-Sixties the band, like the Beatles, used to play
for about thirty minutes at a time, as part of a package of bands. In 1969 the
concept of a rock concert had changed and a band was expected to play for
around 90 minutes and even to stretch out and jam shorter songs into extended workouts.
The Stones certainly extend songs like "Sympathy for the Devil" and
"Midnight Rambler" to emphasise the groove and menace inherent in the
lyrics and loping rhythms.
The live set also showcases the obvious technical abilities of Keith
Richards and Mick Taylor who can show off their chops because the band is
playing to an adoring, attentive audience who are no longer the teenyboppers of
1965. This for example, is why "Carol" and "Little Queenie"
are almost tangible excitement in their high-energy rush. The guitar interplay
for which the Stones became famous when Richards and Brian Jones were in the
band may no longer be applicable but Taylor's virtuosity lifts the performances
and must have challenged Richards into playing at a new level. Being called
"the greatest rock and roll band in the world" might have been a bit
of tongue in cheek hype but it is
credible hype on the evidence of the record of the 1969 tour. The other
evidence is from the soundtrack for the Gimmie Shelter movie, with performances
from Altamont that are at once more ragged and yet all the more powerful for
the circumstances under which these tunes were played.. For all the superhuman
rock and roll imagery and larger than life posturing, the Stones were just five
guys in a band that made it really big. They were prone and vulnerable to as
many of the vicissitudes of life as anyone else even if their money and
managerial power and influence could protect them and isolate them from most of
the daily mundane shit people have to
deal with. No amount of managerial muscle would have saved the Stones from a rioting
force of Hell's Angels.
The pacing of Ya Ya's is thoughtful. The first two songs are loud
and fast, then the band cools down and slows down and plays the blues, first
kind of quietly with "Stray cat Blues" and "Love In Vain"
and then with great menace on "Midnight Rambler." The good thing
about the Stones and their live albums is that they don't seem to want or need to make the tunes sound exactly like the studio originals and do not
get too fussed if the renditions are kind of loose. With so many other bands, and especially
these days, the effort goes towards replicating the studio recording instead of
having fun with it. At first I had thought that Love You Live, the live
album from 1977, was one of the worst, sloppiest live albums I'd ever heard.
Over time and after careful listening the performances were illuminated as
a bunch of professionals trying to add
new life to hoary old tropes and to keep on making their big, over-exposed hits
exciting to play and to listen to all over again.
At the time Ya Ya's was recorded the now very well known tunes
off the preceding two albums were still quite fresh and beguiling as examples
of a band at the top of its form, a songwriters and as performers.
I must say that "Midnight Rambler" is perhaps the most
disquieting lyric the Stones ever recorded and one of the most relentless
grooves, even more so than "Sympathy for the Devil," the song that follows "Midnight
Rambler" on the live set. I prefer the studio version of "Rambler"
because it builds and expands with more subtlety and greater slyness than the
pile driving live version. This is what
I mean by the assertion that the Stones probably want to mess around with the
template so familiar from the records. It's no fun replicating; it's lots of fun innovating.
"Sympathy for the Devil" is also taken a tad too fast. Charlie
Watts' drumming is about the sole reminder of the cool voodoo groove of the
studio track. The brisk pace dissipates, as is the case with "Midnight
Rambler", the menace of the song, which would have been better served as a
long, slow building set closer.
This live version of "Live With Me" is the most disappointing
track. Once again taken too fast and without the signature bass riff of the
studio track that gives the song its
quirky funk.
From here, though, the band roars through a group of rockers, ending off
with a far more electric "Streetfighting Man" than on Beggar's
Banquet, that indeed convinces
us that this is a rock band playing at full potential and with no eye on
heredity, except to provide a rocking good time for the adoring audience.
The Rolling Stones have released a bunch of live albums over the course
of their career, and by now also about
as many DVDs of live performances, and
if I were to rate them, I'd say that Get Yer Ya Ya's Out, Love You
Live and Stripped are the top three, mostly because they reflect, on
the first two, the feisty, loose, rocking Stones without the professional
entourage of the major, record breaking, money making tours of the Eighties,
and because Stripped showcases an album's worth of unpretentious,
unaffected performances of tunes that seem to have been selected for some kind
of fun factor rather than just to trot out yet another set of live renditions
of the best known songs in the canon.
No comments:
Post a Comment